If you know anything about Peru, soccer, or both—one thing is clear: results prove that Peruvian soccer teams are far from the best. With that being said, as I was on MSN today I saw there was an article that headlined “Peruvian team allegedly poison foes”. Of course I was intrigued only to be shocked by the report.
The headline states exactly what happened on the soccer field. In an attempt to win the game after a first rough half, Sport Ancash poisoned their opponents. Little by little players began to collapse in the middle of the field. In total four of the players from Hijos de Acosvinchos collapsed while playing and they were taken to the hospital. After investigations at the hospital, doctors found a sedative drug in the players’ bloodstreams. The coach from Sport Ancash (the team that poisoned the opponents) claims it was the chicken and energy drinks their opponents consumed before the game.
Despite having Peruvian blood, and thus should be a fan of their sports teams… this time I fear Sport Ancash did the poisoning. Morally the whole idea is truly baffling. This event sheds light on a larger idea. Mainly how the demand of winning forces players to sacrifice their dignity, values, and lives to the sport they love. Travel back in time to World Cup 1994: Columbia played the U.S. in the round of 16. A Columbian player scores an own goal causing the U.S. to advance. Upon the Columbian player’s return to his hometown, he is killed at a bar for scoring an own goal. What happened to the love for the game and not the demand and monetary reasons for winning?
If you buy into the teacher’s argument that is another thing on its own…
While many agree that poisoning one’s foes is bad, a more pressing issue is the extent to which athletes in order to win. In this case, it was poising your opponents. Other athletes however choose to take steroids to help impact their game. Steroids are a widely controversial topic among athletics. I feel that athletes fall under the trap to use steroids based on pressures from society. In addition to a demanding schedule, traveling, and a relationship, players are expected to perform at their peak each time. The stress that sports entail, make it easy for athletes to begin using steroids.
So now for a brief debate: are steroids acceptable for athletes given their demanding schedules? A quick and dirty answer in my view is no. Steroids are enhancements and thus do not show the athlete’s actually potential; rather show what happens when you are under an influence. Interestingly enough, I found a teacher’s take on steroids saying that steroids should be acceptable. He points that with doctor’s approval steroids should not be looked down upon due to medical conditions. Furthermore, he notes that often times athletes are not completely drug free when going to play, so what is different with those “enhancers”.
